What were the pros and cons of the bombing of Hiroshima?

What were the pros and cons of the bombing of Hiroshima?

The Pros and Cons of Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki

  • PROS.
  • CONS.
  • Pro #1: The bombs ended WWII.
  • Pro #2: The bombs stopped any more people from dying and saved property.
  • Con #4: The US could have used a better plan.
  • Pro #3: The bombs saved money.
  • Con #3: The bombs were deployed too early.

What were the benefits of dropping the atomic bomb?

The most common advantage usually cited for dropping the atomic bombs is that the action would spare more lives than it cost. There had been recent battles at Okinawa and Iwo Jima that had already cost the American military forces thousands of lives.

What were the negative effects of the atomic bomb?

The uranium bomb detonated over Hiroshima on 6 August 1945 had an explosive yield equal to 15,000 tonnes of TNT. It razed and burnt around 70 per cent of all buildings and caused an estimated 140,000 deaths by the end of 1945, along with increased rates of cancer and chronic disease among the survivors.

What were the main arguments for and against dropping the atomic bomb?

Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as: it was not needed, it was inhumane and it led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war. Still others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.

Why shouldn’t the atomic bomb have been dropped?

Reasons Against Dropping the Atomic Bomb — Argument 3: Use of the Atomic Bombs Was Racially Motivated. Opponents of President Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb argue that racism played an important role in the decision; that had the bomb been ready in time it never would have been used against Germany.

What were the long term effects of the atomic bomb?

Among the long-term effects suffered by atomic bomb survivors, the most deadly was leukemia. An increase in leukemia appeared about two years after the attacks and peaked around four to six years later. Children represent the population that was affected most severely.

Was dropping the atomic bomb a war crime?

Peter Kuznick, director of the Nuclear Studies Institute at American University, wrote of President Truman: “He knew he was beginning the process of annihilation of the species.” Kuznick said the atomic bombing of Japan “was not just a war crime; it was a crime against humanity.” The use of nuclear weapons …