What led to the hunger strike at Pelican Bay State Prison?

What led to the hunger strike at Pelican Bay State Prison?

Two years have passed since people confined in California’s Pelican Bay State Prison initiated a 60-day hunger strike to protest the conditions associated with the prison’s “security housing unit,” or SHU.

What happens if you go on a hunger strike in prison?

Most hunger strikers will take liquids but not solid food. In cases where an entity (usually the state) has or is able to obtain custody of the hunger striker (such as a prisoner), the hunger strike is often terminated by the custodial entity through the use of force-feeding.

Who is Todd Ashker?

DELANO — Todd Ashker, the California lifer whose federal lawsuit ended a policy that allowed prison officials to place incarcerated people on indefinite solitary confinement for alleged gang membership, has been denied parole. Details of Ashker’s Thursday hearing were not immediately available.

Is force feeding legal in the US?

Under United States jurisdiction, force-feeding is frequently used in the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, prompting in March 2006 an open letter by 250 doctors in The Lancet, warning that, in their opinion, the participation of any doctor is contrary to the rules of the World Medical Association.

How much weight can you lose on a hunger strike?

A study in the British Medical Journal states that those undergoing a hunger strike should be monitored closely for severe side effects of starvation after losing 10 percent of their body weight. It also says that very serious conditions will occur when an individual loses 18 percent of their body weight.

What famous prisoners are at Pelican Bay?

Pelican Bay is California’s only supermax prison and has earned notoriety as a cage for the worst of the worst of the state’s criminals. Past inmates include the infamous serial killer Charles Manson.

What have prisoners alleged about placement in Pelican Bay?

A majority of the inhabitants of the Pelican Bay SHU were alleged to be “gang-affiliates” or members, based on “confidential information,” typically meaning other prisoners had informed they were gang-related.